The God has created a man in order that he creates that the God fails to do
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
Friday, 15 March 2013
Fibre bundle formulation of time-dependent mechanics
G.Sardanashvily, Fibre bundle
formulation of time-dependent mechanics, arXiv: 1303.1735
Abstract. We address
classical and quantum mechanics in a general setting of arbitrary
time-dependent transformations. Classical non-relativistic mechanics is
formulated as a particular field theory on smooth fibre bundles over a time
axis R.
Connections on these bundles describe reference frames. Quantum time-dependent
mechanics is phrased in geometric terms of Banach and Hilbert bundles and
connections on these bundles. A quantization scheme speaking this language is
geometric quantization.
Introduction
The technique of symplectic
manifolds is well known to provide the adequate Hamiltonian formulation of
autonomous mechanics . Its realistic example is a mechanical system whose configuration
space is a manifold M and whose phase
space is the cotangent bundle T*M of M provided with the canonical symplectic
form W. Any autonomous Hamiltonian
system locally is of this type.
However, this geometric
formulation of autonomous mechanics is not extended to mechanics under
time-dependent transformations because the symplectic form W fails to be invariant under these transformations. As a
palliative variant, one has developed time-dependent mechanics on a
configuration space Q=RxM where R is the time axis. Its
phase space RxT*M is provided
with the pull-back of the form W. However,
this presymplectic form also is broken by time-dependent transformations.
We address non-relativistic
mechanics in a case of arbitrary time-dependent transformations. Its configuration
space is a fibre bundle Q->R endowed with bundle coordinates (t,q), where t is the standard Cartesian coordinate on the time axis R
with transition functions t'=t+const.
Its velocity space is the first order jet manifold JQ of sections of Q->R. A phase space is the vertical
cotangent bundle V*Q of Q->R.
This formulation of
non-relativistic mechanics is similar to that of classical field theory on
fibre bundles over a base of dimension >1. A difference between mechanics and field theory
however lies in the fact that connections on bundles over R are flat, and they fail to be
dynamic variables, but describe reference frames.
Note that relativistic
mechanics is adequately formulated as particular classical string theory of
one-dimensional submanifolds.
Sunday, 3 March 2013
Graded Lagrangian formalism
G.Sardanashvily, Graded Lagrangian formalism, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 10 (2013) N5 1350016 #
Abstract. Graded Lagrangian
formalism in terms of a Grassmann-graded variational bicomplex on graded
manifolds is developed in a very general setting. This formalism provides the
comprehensive description of reducible degenerate Lagrangian systems, characterized
by hierarchies of non-trivial higher-order Noether identities and gauge
symmetries. This is a general case of classical field theory and Lagrangian
non-relativistic mechanics.
Introduction
Conventional Lagrangian
formalism on fibre bundles Y->X
over a smooth manifold X is
formulated in algebraic terms of a variational bicomplex of exterior forms on
jet manifolds of sections of Y->X
[2, 9, 16, 17, 19, 30, 36, 37]. The cohomology of this bicomplex provides the
global first variational formula for Lagrangians and Euler – Lagrange
operators, without appealing to the calculus of variations. For instance, this
is the case of classical field theory if dimX>1
and non-autonomous mechanics if X=R [19, 20, 35].
However, this formalism is
not sufficient in order to describe reducible degenerate Lagrangian systems
whose degeneracy is characterized by a hierarchy of higher order Noether
identities. They constitute the Kozul--Tate chain complex whose cycles are Grassmann-graded
elements of certain graded manifolds [7, 8, 19]. Moreover, many field models
also deal with Grassmann-graded fields, e.g., fermion fields, antifields and
ghosts [19, 21, 35].
These facts motivate us to
develop graded Lagrangian formalism of even and odd variables [8, 17, 19, 34].
Different geometric models of
odd variables are described either on graded manifolds or supermanifolds. Both
graded manifolds and supermanifolds are phrased in terms of sheaves of graded commutative
algebras [5, 19]. However, graded manifolds are characterized by sheaves
on smooth manifolds, while supermanifolds are constructed by gluing of sheaves
on supervector spaces. Treating odd variables on a smooth manifold X, we follow the Serre – Swan theorem
generalized to graded manifolds (Theorem 7). It states that, if a graded
commutative C(X)-ring is generated by
a projective C(X)-module of finite
rank, it is isomorphic to a ring of graded functions on a graded manifold whose
body is X. In accordance with this
theorem, we describe odd variables in terms of graded manifolds [8, 17, 19, 34].
We consider a generic
Lagrangian theory of even and odd variables on an n-dimensional smooth real manifold X. It is phrased in terms of the Grassmann-graded variational
bicomplex (28) [4, 7, 8, 17, 19, 34]. Graded Lagrangians L and Euler – Lagrange operators are defined as elements of this
bicomplex. Cohomology of the Grassmann-graded variational bicomplex (28)
(Theorems 13 - 14) defines a class of variationally trivial graded Lagrangians
(Theorem 15) and results in the global decomposition (33) of dL (Theorem 16), the first variational
formula (37) and the first Noether Theorem 20.
A problem is that any
Euler – Lagrange operator satisfies Noether identities, which therefore must be
separated into the trivial and non-trivial ones. These Noether identities obey
first-stage Noether identities, which in turn are subject to the second-stage ones,
and so on. Thus, there is a hierarchy of higher-stage Noether identities. In
accordance with general analysis of Noether identities of differential
operators [33], if certain conditions hold, one can associate to a graded
Lagrangian system the exact antifield Koszul – Tate complex (62) possessing the
boundary operator (60) whose nilpotentness is equivalent to all non-trivial
Noether and higher-stage Noether identities [7, 8, 18].
It should be noted that the
notion of higher-stage Noether identities has come from that of reducible
constraints. The Koszul – Tate complex of Noether identities has been invented similarly
to that of constraints under the condition that Noether identities are locally
separated into independent and dependent ones [4, 13]. This condition is
relevant for constraints, defined by a finite set of functions which the inverse
mapping theorem is applied to. However, Noether identities unlike constraints
are differential equations. They are given by an infinite set of functions on a
Frechet manifold of infinite order jets where the inverse mapping theorem fails
to be valid. Therefore, the regularity condition for the Koszul – Tate complex of
constraints is replaced with homology regularity Condition 27 in order to construct the
Koszul – Tate complex (62) of Noether identities.
The second Noether theorems
(Theorems 32 – 34) is formulated in homology terms, and it associates to this
Koszul – Tate complex the cochain sequence of ghosts (71) with the ascent
operator (72) whose components are non-trivial gauge and higher-stage gauge
symmetries of Lagrangian theory.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)